Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Jim Tivy schrieb am 08.07.2009 um 11:51:50 (-0700): > I think SGML needs to die out as do its descendants like HTML. The > W3C should say in the HTML5 specification that the SGML serialization > is deprecated. Perhaps new features do not have an SGML serialization. > I really don't think young people are learning SGML and I never plan > to learn it. Maybe I'm not super-young any more, but I recently found some very useful SGML documentation on the web. It's a nifty system, and I'm going to learn SGML with its cool features like <D/2009-07-09/ just for the fun of being reactionary and defying the Zeitgeist. Here's a list of what I gathered on SGML on the Web: * James Clark's SP processor * "A Gentle Introduction to SGML" by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen and Lou Burnard - http://www.isgmlug.org/sgmlhelp/g-index.htm * James Clark's note "Comparison of SGML and XML" http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-sgml-xml-971215 * "SGML and HTML Explained" by Martin Bryan, available from his website http://www.is-thought.co.uk/book/home.htm * "From Wiki to XML, through SGML", article by Rick Jelliffe http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/1377 * Cover pages on SGML, many links are dead http://xml.coverpages.org/sgml.html If you know of more useful high-quality SGML information, please let me know. Michael Ludwig
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
