• From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:15:48 -0700

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Michael Kay<mike@s...> wrote:
>> The implementation of Higher Order Functions (HOF) in XSLT (1.0 or
>> 2.0) would not have been possible if the namespace mechanism
>> was not available.
>
> I think you mean "some kind of namespace mechanism". The current namespace
> mechanism is probably better than having none at all, but it still has many
> serious problems.

Yes, the HOF implementation uses namespaces as it would use any
available GUID mechanism.


-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: rjelliffe@a...

• References:
  • XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@r...>
  • RE: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...>
  • RE: XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Do namespaces address all use cases well
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Namespace use cases
    • From: Micah Dubinko <micah.dubinko@m...>
  • RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: "Jim Tivy" <jimt@b...>
  • Re: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@g...>
  • RE: RE: Namespace use cases
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>