Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Jun 5, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Liam Quin wrote: > On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:01:38PM -0400, Robert Koberg wrote: >> I wish it weren't so, believe me. But follow some javascript oriented >> lists. Look for support for XSL in the popular (even unpopular) JS >> libraries. > > It's true that the javaScript interfaces to XSLT are sucky. I > think this an area W3C (i.e. us) should have standardised. > > This doesn't mean no-one is using XSL. The popular JS libraries > don't support PNG or JPEG images either - try asking for the > number of unique colours in the image, or a histogram, or even > the actual image dimensions - but it would be crazy to assumes this > means that images are not used on the Web. I would not consider this a valid comparison. > > > The biggest change recently was that Opera 8 and later support > client-side XSLT. not completely. No document function, which is kind of a biggie. > One does have still to support server-side > translation for things like the google Web crawler, and maybe mobile > devices. Netscape Navigator, IE, Mozilla, all supported it for years. > > So I think we may see increased uptake. I hope you are right... -Rob > > > Liam > > -- > Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ > http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
