[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Wednesday 03 June 2009 19:31, Costello, Roger L. wrote: > I'd like for us to nail down exactly what we mean by "descriptive markup" > and "algorithmic markup." On Thursday 04 June 2009 03:06, Michael Kay wrote: > Why, what do you hope to achieve? I thought the whole point of trying to separate the two types of markup was to figure out which kind of markup allows limited computing power necessary to deduce its meaning. To make a decision based on a descriptive markup, you don't need to implement a Turing machine who noone knows when it will stop. So, descriptive markup is the markup whose meaning can be deduced in a bound finite time. To make a decision based on algorithmic markup, you would have to execute the algorithm. The same markup can be descriptive or algorithmic based on what decision you're trying to make. Imagine an XSLT stylesheet. If you want to figure out whether the stylesheet takes a parameter named "starting_date", the markup is descriptive because you can figure out the answer with a simple XPath expression you know is bound to produce the answer in a finite time. If you want to figure out the result the stylesheet, the XSLT markup is algorithmic. You'd have to build and run the actual XSLT processor to figure it out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Undecidable_problem ps. Just my take on the discussion -- Nicholas Sushkin, Senior Software Engineer http://www.openfinance.com http://www.wealthinformationexchange.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



