- From: David Orchard <orchard@p...>
- To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:54:21 -0800
Defaulting values came from SGML days and DTDs.. So it's been around for a while. Many folks have wanted the validation and augmentation steps separate though no real progress on that.
Dave
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> wrote:
>> 2. I validated the XML instance document with the schema.
>
> ... when I'm using validation to augment my XML....
imho, "validation" and "augment" should be kept separate... If you
need the augmentation call the step just that, not validation.
I don't know the history of it, but I would guess defaulted values
were a late addition to the validation process, rather than something
included from the beginning??
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
