• From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...>
• To: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 13:49:50 +0200

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> writes:

> Surely you wouldn't return a delimited string, you would return person
> nodes and then select the values from the returned nodes?

Yes, good point. I will see if I can change the test to do this.


> Also, the comparison isn't quite right - the only fair thing would be
> time how long it takes to output the information to a file or standard
> out (the gui language would likely be different in either case, say
> swing vs html)

Well, my original claim was that in a use case where we have has to
interface with other, non-XML data sources, query most of the data
in the document and perform multiple such queries, XML data binding
will perform better than XQuery. Michael asked for evidence and I
came up with this benchmark. I believe for this scenario the
comparison is fair since both the data binding and XQuery tests get
input information and send output by calling native programming
language functions.

Boris

-- 
Boris Kolpackov, Code Synthesis Tools   http://codesynthesis.com/~boris/blog
Open source XML data binding for C++:   http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsd
Mobile/embedded validating XML parsing: http://codesynthesis.com/products/xsde

• References:
  • Re: XML Schema: "Best used with the ______ tool"
    • From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...>
  • Re: XML Schema: "Best used with the ______ tool"
    • From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>