• From: Amelia A Lewis <amyzing@t...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
• Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:14:49 -0500

On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:57:57 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> Another group might take the opposite view and say that the use of 
> grammars is actually precludes any system of mixins, because grammars 
> are based on specifying sequences of continuingly contiguous 
> particles: wildcards notwithstanding. (Contrast with Schematron, 
> where a 'pattern' fits well as a mixin, without a formal inheritance 
> mechanism.)

Is this not also true of the Relax NG grammar?

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis                    amyzing {at} talsever.com
Confidence: a feeling peculiar to the stage just before full
comprehension of the problem.

• References:
  • Multiple Inheritance in XML Schema
    • From: "Ramkumar Menon" <ramkumar.menon@g...>
  • Re: Multiple Inheritance in XML Schema
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>