[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...> wrote: > Hi Roger, > There are many software applications, which need imperative > programming infrastructure (where we should be able to change program > state at will, like using assignment statement as so on). hmmm, I am personally confused as to where imperative programming languages plot these days ... I blame the stateless web for this and that the average age of a lot of FORTRAN, COBOL, and ALGOL (I love the way all those are caps) developers means there is natural progression to ignoring fads. I think perhaps the single largest reason is advances in hardware enabling us to use a lot of the power of other programming idioms, that were not possible before. > Examples of such applications could be, > 1. Complex business logic (say I am implementing a work flow for an > insurance company) look at all the middleware happening thats based on web services (tibco is a representative company using XML everywhere) > 2. Game programming :) I am not a gamer, but I have heard that world of warcraft is heavily doped up with XML > 3. GUI programming reminds me of glade http://glade.gnome.org/ and I would point you towards silverlight > To my opinion, none of the above tasks can be done (or easily done) in > XML based languages. in the hands of a master I think all these tasks could be done in a lot of languages ... in fact I think I have seen all three of the flavours of apps you mention programmed successfully in postscript of all things! > Whereas XML based languages are specialized to process XML data. I agree, XML based languages are best in situations where there is a lot of XML around. cheers, Jim Fuller
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



