• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'Boris Kolpackov'" <boris@c...>
• Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 11:24:48 -0000

One other observation on this "benchmark": 

> Note how in the XQuery case I had to invent a delimiter (':') 
> for the first, last, and age fields so that I could pass them 
> as a string from XQuery to the programming language. I then 
> had to manually parse this string and convert the age field 
> to unsigned short. To me, this doesn't look easier than data 
> binding at all.

The idea I'm pushing is that you write the application end-to-end using
XML-based languages. That means that you never convert the data into C++ or
Java data types. If you only go half way, by calling XQuery from Java and
then converting the results to Java values, you lose half the benefits.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schema: "Best used with the ______ tool"
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

• References:
  • Re: XML Schema: "Best used with the ______ tool"
    • From: Boris Kolpackov <boris@c...>