• From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: "Len Bullard" <len.bullard@u...>
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:45:50 +0100

In my limited experience, the person with best grasp of the project
and the problem itself, is the main developer.   You don't fully
understand the problem until you are in the middle of developing the
solution, making you best placed in that regard.  And when you present
the options to the decision-maker you give them the implications of
each, in order that they make the right decision (so you tailor the
implications accordingly :)

Often the BAs and PMs are just go-betweens, relaying information
between customers and developers without adding much value inbetween.
Some even have the cheek to put the devs directly in touch with the
customer, and only speak to the devs when they need to report progress
to the management (where the specialise in taking credit during the
good times and offloading blame during the bad).   Letting them make
decisions would be dangerous.



2008/10/16 Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>:
> I didn't say "blind", Mike.  I said, "Not their shot to call".   I also said
> they should inform the business manager about performance and I consider
> improvements to design a performance issue.  It is the data designers
> obligation to inform.   It is not their right to determine.
>

-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

• References:
  • RE: RE: [Summary #2] Should Subject Matter Experts Determine XML Data Implementations?
    • From: Len Bullard <len.bullard@u...>