[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Kurt Cagle" <kurt.cagle@g...>
  • To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 17:30:24 -0700

In my experience designing ontologies for different groups, one thing that I find keeps cropping up is that SMEs tend to create data structures that most closely approximate their understanding of a subject, not necessarily that provides the most optimal representation of that data model. Certainly SMEs should be involved at all stages of the ontology process, but I've also found that if left up to the SME alone, the models are often awkward to implement, tend to be overspecified, and as often as not contain sometimes bizarre assumptions that can significantly limit these models when translated into a computing environment.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Costello, Roger L. <costello@m...> wrote:

Hi Folks,

Thanks for your excellent comments!

I wrote a summary, which I titled:

  A Process for XML Data Design

http://www.xfront.com/process-for-XML-data-design/

Comments welcome.

/Roger

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php




--
Kurt Cagle
Managing Editor, http://xml.com
O'Reilly
kurt@o...



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member