• From: Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...>
• To: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:51:54 +0200

Mukul Gandhi a écrit :
> Hi all,
>    I wrote the following blog post. This is perhaps a weird thought,
> for people having worked with XML for long.
> 
> http://mukulgandhi.blogspot.com/2008/09/should-we-include-version10-in-xpath.html
> 
> This is a short description of the points I have in mind.
> 
> Could you please let us know, if my logic have any merit.
> 

Perhaps exposed as attributes ?

/@version
/@standalone
/@encoding

This would have the advantage to keep as-is the XML syntax

-- 
Cordialement,

               ///
              (. .)
  --------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
|      Philippe Poulard       |
  -----------------------------
  http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
        Have the RefleX !

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath datamodel, or DOM
    • From: Philippe Poulard <philippe.poulard@s...>
  • Re: Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath data model, or DOM
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>

• References:
  • Should we include the XML prolog in the XPath data model, or DOM
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>