• From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@g...>
• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 09:39:53 -0700

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
>>
>> I have used Java only occasionally and even that was many years ago.
>>
>> Good support of generics is required for the inplementation
>> of a finger tree.
>
> Generics don't allow you to do anything that you can't do without them. They
> only allow you to do it in a way that is more strongly typed.
>

Thanks for the correction, I should have said:

" Good support of generics is required for an ellegant inplementation
of a finger tree."

Probably this is my own personal problem, but I find using the "
'object' type" ugly.

Anyway, an ugly implementation is still better than none at all.

-- 
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play

• References:
  • Re: Discover data patterns or Create data patterns?
    • From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@g...>
  • Re: Re: Discover data patterns or Create data patterns?
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>
  • Re: Re: Discover data patterns or Create data patterns?
    • From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@g...>
  • RE: Re: Discover data patterns or Create data patterns?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>