• From: "Jack Lindsey" <Jack@L...>
• To: <fmeschini@t...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:10:29 -0400

Fill yer boots
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym

I agree with Fede because, although XML sounds like an initialism, the X
stands for extensible so it has to be an acronym.  But this source also
agrees that all initialisms and acronyms are abbreviations, so we good!

Cheers

Jack Lindsey

-----Original Message-----
From: fmeschini@t... [mailto:fmeschini@t...] 
Sent: Sunday 24 August, 2008 13:24
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject:  R: Re:  Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?

>The XML specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816/ 
starts with,
>Extensible Markup Language, abbreviated XML, describes 
...
>So the spec says, it's an abbreviation ...

Probably because 
'acronymied' is a little bit of a cacophony, and to write 'abbreviated 
through the acronym' was too complex of a sentence.

Technically XML is 
an acronym, as GNU, SQL, FAT, BBC or TARDIS are. Probably we should 
discuss whehter an 'acronym' is a subtype of the more general 
'abbreviation' type which is at the same time disjointed from the 
'contraction' subtype (e.g. Dr. for Doctor).

Fede

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php

• References:
  • R: Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
    • From: "fmeschini@t..." <fmeschini@t...>