• From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
• To: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...>
• Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:31:28 +0530

I think WikiPedia is not a reliable source of information sometimes,
as it can be edited by any person. Though I like it very much, and get
an indication of what something means.

to me, dictionary.com is a more reliable source for english dictionary
related information, as it is maintained by professional language
specialists.

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Alexander Johannesen
<alexander.johannesen@g...> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 14:54, Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@g...> wrote:
>> I am convinced about the correctness of these definitions (taken, from
>> www.dictionary.com, which I am following since many years, and regard
>> highly).
>
> And the WikiPedia entry? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym)
>
>
> Alex
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
> ------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
    • From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...>

• References:
  • Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
    • From: mike@m...
  • Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
    • From: "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul@g...>
  • Re: Is "XML" an abbreviation or an acronym?
    • From: "Alexander Johannesen" <alexander.johannesen@g...>