• From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: "Dave Pawson" <davep@d...>
• Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:02:15 +0100

On 25/04/2008, Dave Pawson <davep@d...> wrote:
> > NVDL is focused on allowing extensibility of the XML, but at the end
> > of an NVDL validation the XML instance is valid and unchanged.
> >
>
>  Would you expect any xml instance to be changed by a validation process?

No but there are the dreaded defaulted values in DTDs and XML
Schema... and perhaps you could say the PSVI is a modified input - but
at least that can't break your processing... (although I'm not 100% on
that... maybe there are a few gotchas there?)


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Design for Diverse Data
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>

• References:
  • Re: XML Design for Diverse Data
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • RE: XML Design for Diverse Data
    • From: "Cox, Bruce" <Bruce.Cox@U...>
  • Re: XML Design for Diverse Data
    • From: George Cristian Bina <george@o...>
  • Re: XML Design for Diverse Data
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: XML Design for Diverse Data
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>