[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: COUTHURES Alain <alain.couthures@a...>
  • To: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:21:28 +0200

My point of view is that XML is a notation for anything we want and that an XML document can always be interpreted as data or orders.

I don't see a major difference when we write a <table> element in an XHTML page between :
  • the declarative approach : there is a table element at this location of the current page
  • the imperative approach : draw a table on the screen
Even a web service can be interpreted as a semantic transformation : for example, "current temperature at Bordeaux" is replaced by "13°C".

For me, it's also restrictive to consider that XML is for mobility only. I like the comparison between XML and ASCII. ASCII is everywhere so should XML because it's an upper level for structuring electronic data of any kind (programs, records,...).

Alain COUTHURES
<agenceXML>
http://www.agencexml.com
Bordeaux, France


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member