[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: <contact@s...>
  • To: <xmlschema-dev@w...>,<xml-dev@l...>,"Henry S. Thompson" <ht@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:13:06 +0100

Dear all!

I'm currently support for XSV into the next release of ValidatorBuddy 
(http://www.spycomponents.com/ValidatorBuddy.htm) and started to do some 
tests. Actually the integration uses the xsv.exe which comes with the 
Windows installer (ValidatorBuddy also runs only on Windows).

I have a 40 MB XML instance file which is rather flat (no deep nesting) 
which I use do check how the different parsers are doing with rather large 
files and a simple xsd for it. On using XSV to validate it the process 
(xsv.exe) takes about 1 GB of memory and after a few minutes I killed it. 
AltovaXML and Xerces-C 2.7 are able to validate the XML in a few seconds 
(and consuming less memory). Is it just the specific XML or XSV can't 
validate larger XML instances?

Beside that I like the detailed error reporting of XSV and that the output 
is generated as XML by the xsv.exe tool. This makes it very easy to parse 
the output.

Regards, Ewa

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member