[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: "Nassar, Anthony" <ANassar@H...>
  • To: <xml-dev@l...>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:39:38 -0500

Title: RE: The prefix "fgdc" for element "fgdc:fgdc" is not bound

I thank everyone for their responses. Perhaps this bears out Dr. Kay's claim, but I'm actually more baffled than ever. If the NUnit test-results.xsd schema specifies *no* namespace, then the types it declares are in *no* namespace, is that right? How does a schema-aware parser use them, if at all? Does it simply fake it (i.e., if you were foolish enough to declare types in the non-namespace, I guess I'll have to bail you out)?

My more immediate question, which I might need to answer for myself, is simply, is NUnit's schema just "wrong"?



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member