• From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>
• To: Bill Kearney <wkearney99@h...>
• Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:25:34 +0200

Bill Kearney wrote:
> ...
> And to throw another monkey into the wrench, when you use numeric 
> entities in XML they're ALWAYS indicated using ISO 10646 regardless of 
> the document's declarations.  Thus even in an ISO-8859-1 XML document 
> you would not use é for it, you'd have to use 쎩   \
> ...

That would be bad, very bad. Fortunately, that is incorrect (trying to 
say this politely :-).

Best regards, Julian

• References:
  • UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent should require two bytes, right?
    • From: "Alessandro Triglia" <sandro@m...>
  • Re: [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute accent shouldrequire two bytes, right?
    • From: Bill Kearney <wkearney99@h...>