Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
I was not in any sense confused. Perhaps you would care to re-read what I wrote. Cheers, Tony. On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:58:13 +0100, Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@g...> wrote: > On 8/3/07, Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) > <abcoatesecure-xmldev@y...> wrote: >> I've seen it demonstrated using the commercial version of Saxon >> (www.saxonica.com). I believe the Altova XML Query Processor also has >> support, although it may not be fully debugged yet (but is said to be >> making progress). I'm sure there are others, but I don't know which >> ones. The W3C list of XQuery implementations is here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/#implementations >> >> but this doesn't tell you which implement Schema-awareness. I know that >> some implementations apparently do not intend to implement it. I'm sure >> the vendors of XQuery processors that are Schema-aware won't be shy to >> post a note to that effect on this list, but it would be helpful if the >> W3C page captured that information, which it doesn't right now. > > I think you're a bit confused here - schema-aware transforms and > XQueries are one thing, validating your input using a combination of > XML Schema + XPath is another. > > Schema-aware transforms/XQueries require XML Schema - if you so wished > you could implement some form of validation yourself using a > combination of XSLT, XQuery and XML Schema[1], but when you talk about > "Schema Aware" its purely about XML Schema. > > [1] like I did: http://xchecker.sf.net/ -- Anthony B. Coates Senior Partner Miley Watts LLP Experts In Data UK: +44 (20) 8816 7700, US: +1 (239) 344 7700 Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026 Data standards participant: genericode, ISO 20022 (ISO 15022 XML), UN/CEFACT, MDDL, FpML, UBL. http://www.mileywatts.com/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |
