• From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>
• To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>
• Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 00:14:29 +0200

Klotz, Leigh a écrit :
> Or use RNG ;-)
>  
> http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/relax-CHP-7-SECT-2.html [Erik van 
> der Vlist, why you should]
> http://www.simonstl.com/articles/sanity/relaxngSchema.html [Simon St. 
> Laurent, why you can't]
> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2004/02/11/relaxtron.html [Eddie Robertsson, 
> what it doesn't do] 
Some kind of co-occurrence constraints can't be expressed with relax NG

Have a look at the Active Schema Language for more complex examples with 
really simple solution :
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/tutorial-schemas.html

http://ns.inria.org/active-tags/active-schema/active-schema.html

-- 
Cordialement,

             ///
            (. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
|      Philippe Poulard       |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
      Have the RefleX !

• References:
  • RE: XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule
    • From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@x...>