• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• To: "Brendan Macmillan" <melbourne.research@g...>
• Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 14:44:05 +0200

sorry, I should have put it in there earlier for the reference
http://www.w3.org/TR/xproc/

Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

On 4/7/07, Brendan Macmillan <melbourne.research@g...> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not an answer to bryan's XML Pipeline question, but I'm interested in
> the syntax the Working Draft spec uses for specifying its grammar...
> it seems simple and intuitive though I haven't seen it written about
> before.
>
> > <p:output
> >   port = NCName
> >   sequence? = yes|no
> >   default? = yes|no>
> >    (p:pipe |
> >     p:document |
> >     p:inline)*
> > </p:output>
>
> I couldn't find any info on the syntax itself in the WS spec - does
> anyone have any pointers about it, please?
>
> many thanks,
> Brendan Macmillan
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: xproc http output ports? also, a good list for xproc discussion?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• References:
  • xproc http output ports? also, a good list for xproc discussion?
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: xproc http output ports? also, a good list for xproc discussion?
    • From: "Brendan Macmillan" <melbourne.research@g...>