• From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 13:45:17 +0000

What's considered off-topic for xml-dev?

I would've thought 2D vs 3D discussions were OT...

It seems most threads on xml-dev end up as discussions about X3D and
VRML, regardless of how they started - take this one for example.

Perhaps that's the reason xml-dev defaults to reply-to-sender instead
of reply-to-list, to make you really think about whether the archives
would benefit from your reply.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: When parsing speed matters (was Re: NoXML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
    • From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>

• References:
  • RE: When parsing speed matters (was Re: NoXML Binaries? Buy Hardware)
    • From: "Stephen Green" <stephen.green@b...>