• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• To: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:59:03 -0400

Philippe Poulard wrote:

> I tried my theory on another implementation : I suppose that XOM passes 
> the test suite (and the [eduni-2] test case), so I just try to resolve 
> the inclusion on my example ; I just replace the xpointer() scheme which 
> is not supported by XOM with an equivalent element() scheme, and I get 
> the result expected, as XOM is certainly implemented to pass the 
> [eduni-2] test case, it also resolves correctly my test, but when I 
> replace the xpointer expression to cause a loop exception, I get the 
> famous infinite loop :
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.StackOverflowError
> 

Just to be clear, you have created documents which generate a stack 
overflow in XOM, correct?

If so, I'd appreciate it if you could mail me copies of these documents 
so I can investigate the problem. Thanks.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XInclude inconsistency ?
    • From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>

• References:
  • XInclude inconsistency ?
    • From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@s...>