• From: Razvan MIHAIU <xml.dev.ro@g...>
• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:06:25 +0200

Michael Kay wrote:
>> This looks like what I need, but it is quite complicated... I 
>> was expected something simpler.
>>
>>     
>
> Generic schemas are always more complicated than you expect. That's because
> your requirements are a subset of the requirements of the community as a
> whole, often quite a small subset. A published generic schema will tend to
> be the union of everyone's requirements.
>   
    In that case it might be better to develop my own "quick" version. I 
will have to explain a small set of rules to the partner sites, 
otherwise I need to explain this generic specification which is much 
more complex.

    I am thinking what is the best trade-off.


Regards,
Razvan N.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML dictionary - second try
    • From: Betty Harvey <harvey@e...>

• References:
  • RE: XML dictionary - second try
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>