• From: "Shlomo Yona" <S.Yona@F...>
• To: "Chris Burdess" <dog@b...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:59:06 -0800

So the processor is still expected to issue a "not well formed" message, but might still tolerate the result?

Shlomo.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Burdess [mailto:dog@b...] 
Sent: â 20 ôáøåàø 2007 17:56
To: Shlomo Yona
Cc: xml-dev org
Subject: Re:  a namespace definitions related question(s)

Shlomo Yona wrote:
> If the XML processor that processes the XML document that I gave as  
> example is also validating and is namespace aware what is the  
> correct answer?

It's still no. Every document that conforms to XML 1.0 Namespaces  
also conforms to XML 1.0.

_______________________________________________________________________

XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.

[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: a namespace definitions related question(s)
    • From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
  • RE: a namespace definitions related question(s)
    • From: noah_mendelsohn@u...
  • Re: a namespace definitions related question(s)
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>

• References:
  • Re: a namespace definitions related question(s)
    • From: Chris Burdess <dog@b...>