- From: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@m...>
- To: "Radu Cernuta" <radu.cernuta@g...>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:36:10 -0800
I’m sure you’re correct,
however the error I get from Jing is this:
C:\ > java -jar
\xml\jing-20030619\bin\jing.jar test.rng
C:\ > Test.rng:28:43: error: recursive
inclusion of URL "file:/C:/[…]/Test.rng"
I now wonder: if all patterns are defined inside
a containing grammar, could one except the container from a contained definition?
That way, all definitions would be excluded automatically when new ones
were added to the container. Something I’ll try later…
From: Radu Cernuta
[mailto:radu.cernuta@g...]
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007
1:56 AM
To: Jeff
Lowery
Cc: noah_mendelsohn@u...;
xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re: RELAX NG
equivalent of <xsd:any processContents="lax">?
Sorry, I've overlooked
the <optional> element. Rule 4.12 comes first in this case and adds a
<group>, then 7.15. The basic idea stays the same: you cannot have
several roots in an XML document.
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|
Cart
