[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
curious about this. why not the traditional data solution of an extra attribute specifying the type of measure? as in <item name="water" measure="volume" value="22" /> it also opens up lots of extra, easy, possibilities for analysis. Rick pau carre wrote: > I am trying to code a XML Schema (XSD file) for a web service in such > a way: > > <items> > <item name = "water" volume ="22"> > <item name = "meat" weight = "10" > > </items> > > It is to say, if name is "water" , then use the "volume" attribute. > When name is "meat" then use "weight" attribute. > > What I have done is to define a simple type for name attribute > > <xs:simpleType name="nameType"> > <xs:restriction base="xs:string"> > <xs:enumeration value="water"/> > <xs:enumeration value="meat"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:simpleType> > > Then I defined an abstract complex type for "item" element: > > <xs:complexType name="itemType" abstract = "true"> > <xs:attribute name = "name" type = "nameType"/> > </xs:complexType> > > I restricted the "name" attribute to "meat": > > <xs:complexType name="itemTypeMeat"> > <xs:complexContent> > <xs:restriction base="itemType"> > <xs:attribute name = "name" type = "nameType" > fixed="meat"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:complexContent> > </xs:complexType> > > ... and finally I added an attribute "weight": > > <xs:complexType name="itemTypeMeatWeight"> > <xs:complexContent> > <xs:extension base="itemTypeMeat"> > <xs:attribute name = "weight" type = "xs:int"/> > </xs:extension> > </xs:complexContent> > </xs:complexType> > > For the "water" is the same as "meat". First I restricted the "name" > attribute to "water": > > <xs:complexType name="itemTypeWater"> > <xs:complexContent> > <xs:restriction base="itemType"> > <xs:attribute name = "name" type = "nameType" > fixed="water"/> > </xs:restriction> > </xs:complexContent> > </xs:complexType> > > ... and finally I added the "volume" attribute > > <xs:complexType name="itemTypeWaterVolume"> > <xs:complexContent> > <xs:extension base="itemTypeWater"> > <xs:attribute name = "volume" type = "xs:int"/> > </xs:extension> > </xs:complexContent> > </xs:complexType> > > The problem is to define the type for "item" element. If I use > "itemType" as type it the XML does not validated because > "itemType" is abstract. I I use: > > <xs:element name="items"> > <xs:complexType> > <xs:sequence> > <xs:choice> > <xs:element name="item" > type="itemTypeWaterVolume"/> > <xs:element name="item" > type="itemTypeMeatWeight"/> > </xs:choice> > </xs:sequence> > </xs:complexType> > </xs:element> > > the XML does not validate because the validator assumes that the > "item" type is the first defined (itemTypeWaterVolume). If I > change the declaration of "item" element then the validator > assumes that the type of "item" is "itemTypeMeatWeight". > > Do you know how to solve this problem? > > Thanks in advance. > > Pau > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS > to support XML implementation and development. To minimize > spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting. > > [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/ > Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l... > subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l... > List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



