• From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
• To: "'Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)'" <natyoung@c...>, "'XML Developers List'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:45:46 -0600

http://news.com.com/Cisco+spends+135+million+on+XML+firm/2100-1036_3-6160998
.html?tag=ne.fd.mnbc

If XML has such a negligible impact on performance, why do companies like
Cisco and IBM buy small companies that build XML hardware accelerators?

I accept that one wants to find out what the bottlenecks are, but I can't
accept that companies this big spending this much money haven't.

len

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
    • From: "Michael Champion" <mc@x...>
  • RE: No XML Binaries? Buy Hardware
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• References:
  • better (?) than DOM
    • From: "Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)" <natyoung@c...>