• From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@k...>
• To: "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@g...>
• Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 13:47:50 -0500

On Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:58:16 -0500, derek denny-brown <zuligag@g...>  
wrote:

> These questions seem to be falling into the same trap that Dare
> complained about.  JSON is a simple single solution to a whole set of
> problems.  It addresses cross-domain access.  It is fast.  It is easy
> to use.  On every account, XML fares worse.

Yep. I aknowledged that. It does not work for my needs.

I even went so far as creating a JS version of cached SAX events for the  
(deeply) nested JSON object(s). I even tried to create a transformation  
object for it. I couldn't figure out how to do it. Probably someone can. I  
am just asking questions :)

-Rob

• References:
  • json v. xml
    • From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@k...>
  • Re: json v. xml
    • From: "derek denny-brown" <zuligag@g...>