[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On 1/10/07, David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote: > If using a DTD to define (say) xhtml, you need to declare xmlns as an > attribute (as it is an attribute at the DTD layer) and it's very > tempting to specify that its only allowed value is > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml > but unfortunately #FIXED doesn't just define the legal value, it > defaults that value if the attribute is omitted, so I don't think that > in DTD there is any way to indicate (other than in comments) the > namespace for which the grammar is intended, without defaulting this > attribute. ...agreed but the author of the XML should still leave the namespace declarations in the XML - just because a by-product of making them #FIXED is that they are also defaulted, doesn't mean they should be removed from the XML - thats just frustrating. I've always thought augmenting XML through validation is a really bad idea - who wants to wade through a DTD to get the full picture? (and then have to validate *every* time the XML is read) I guess we all know DTDs, XML and namespaces don't play well together - its just a shame its used so often...
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] |

Cart



