• From: Tei <oscar.vives@g...>
• To: "XML Developers List" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:45:32 +0100

On 1/15/07, Richard Salz <rsalz@u...> wrote:
> > HTTPS why:
> >  Default to safe.
>
> Please define safe.  Please be as technical as you can.
>
>         /r$

Is hard, ill try

safe:
 - protected from nake eye inspection of actual data HTTP move
 - validate server identity, that can serve to avoid phising or DNS spoofing.
 - protected content from malware javascript/html inyection
 - validate client identity? (not idea about this, but I think is posible)
 - cypher is strong against brute force
 - cypher strong against password distribution problem (PKI dont need
that ...much)

Other than that. Again. Maybe was not soo a good idea, cause people
want fast porn. Not safe or private porn. Wait... bad analogy.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: 2007 Predictions
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
  • Re: 2007 Predictions
    • From: "David Megginson" <david.megginson@g...>

• References:
  • Re: 2007 Predictions
    • From: Tei <oscar.vives@g...>
  • Re: 2007 Predictions
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>