- From: "Len Bullard" <cbullard@h...>
- To: "'Kurt Cagle'" <kurt.cagle@g...>, "'Michael Champion'" <mc@x...>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:45:21 -0600
Who cares?
If you need a patent to secure funding,
and funding requires a 4 for one bump on the exit strategy, a web browser
hosted application is the last thing you want to build. You want to
build something that you can defend by any means necessary until you sell it to
someone whose distribution is so large that defending it is just a call to a
department in the next building, and otherwise, is so remarkably unique that
stealing it is so obvious even a hip-hop DJ wouldn’t try it.
What the griefer vs the Anshe Chung/Graef
DMCA complaint stunts show is that the future of the web as a profit engine is
NOT in ubiquitous inclusive consensus-driven communications: it is about
closed firewalled paid-up-dues entertainment. It is not about
gathering; it is about enclosing. It is not about reaching-out; it
is about exclusion.
This thread is trying to make the case
that a college library with math texts in 1964 was as popular as a drive in
theatre showing Dr No. It just ain’t so. I leave it to
your own tastes and research to determine which was more powerful or had a
greater influence on the culture of 2007. Better yet, ask your Mom and
Dad which would have been a more likely place for you to have been conceived.
Power is money. Otherwise, it is just
influence. People don’t want the Least. They want The
Most. See Bill Haley and The Comets.
len
From: Kurt Cagle
[mailto:kurt.cagle@g...]
<snip />
All of web communication is ultimately a question about the contract between
the information provider and the information consumer.
<snip
/>
Too much power will blow up my computer, too little
and it can't run. That's the principle of least power - provide what is
necessary and sufficient at the moment.
|
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
|