• From: "Joselito D. Moreno" <joenmoreno@g...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 11:43:37 -0600

Minor correction.  I used XMLBeans scomp tool to validate the schema
posted by Srini.  The error in this particular example is not against
the Unique Particle Attribution constraint but against the Element
Declarations Consistent constraint
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-element-consistent).

Joen Moreno

On 11/28/06, Michael Kay <mike@s...> wrote:
> > With the above error message, It looks like the XML schema
> > file is not valid. But I am not sure how XMLSpy is validating
> > this file successfully
>
> XMLSpy does not enforce all the rules of the XML Schema spec, in particular
> the Unique Particle Attribution rule. Xerces is a much more conformant
> implementation.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: xml-dev-unsubscribe@l...
> subscribe: xml-dev-subscribe@l...
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>

• References:
  • Elements with same name and different data type
    • From: "S, Srinivasan (Srinivasan)" <srini@l...>
  • RE: Elements with same name and different data type
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>