• From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
• To: "David Carlisle" <davidc@n...>
• Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:15:58 +0000

Thanks David. The reason is a long and very boring story related to
historic (non xml aware) software. But thanks for your suggestion, I
am looking to change the requirement along these lines.

Fraser.

On 15/11/06, David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote:
> > Am I right in assuming that the following would be an invalid XML
> yes.
>
> Why an elemnt name rather than
> <thing name="PremisesRatingData(NU)_FloodRate">
> ?
>
> David
>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Valid element name
    • From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>

• References:
  • Valid element name
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@g...>
  • Re: Valid element name
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>