[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]

  • From: Tony Graham <tkg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: xml-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:31:07 -0400

Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> writes:
> peter murray-rust wrote:
>> Remember also that XML was a direct descendant of SGML. SGML was
>> typical first version system - over-ambitious and (I believe) never
>> fully implemented in a single piece of software.
> There are two optional features in SGML that were not implemented by
> the dominant parsers
> (OmniMark, SP, SGMLS) which were DATATAG and CONCUR. IIRC there were
> private systems that used them however. (E.g. TEI has CONCUR YES.)

For the record, the Mark-It parser from the SEMA Group implemented all
the optional features.  It was the first SGML parser that I ever used,
so I ended up using all the features, including DATATAG and CONCUR but
maybe not RANK, at various times.

Do I miss all the features?  Not at all, not even CONCUR.  When you
need CONCUR, you really need CONCUR, but happily I only needed it the
once.

Regards,


Tony.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member