• From: Tony Graham <tkg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• To: xml-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 05:39:11 -0400

<juanrgonzaleza@c...> writes:
...
> 3) Less verbosity. And this _is_ a point with very large datuments,
> therein some guides in the famous element vs. attribute dilema recommend
> usage of attributes when size is an issue.

I'm not familiar with the word "datument".  FWIW, nor is Google since
it asks "Did you mean: document".

Are you using it in the sense used by Peter Murry-Rust and Henry
S. Rzepa[1]:

   A datument is a hyperdocument for transmitting "complete"
   information including content and behaviour.

or in some other sense?

Regards,


Tony.

[1] http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/v05/i01/Murray-Rust/#4

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: datument? [Was: Generic XML Tag Closer </> (GXTC)]
    • From: juanrgonzaleza

• References:
  • Re: Generic XML Tag Closer </> (GXTC)
    • From: Rick Marshall
  • Re: Generic XML Tag Closer </> (GXTC)
    • From: juanrgonzaleza