• From: Philippe Poulard <Philippe.Poulard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• To: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:36:38 +0200

Florent Georges wrote:
> Philippe Poulard wrote:
> 
> 
>>-Saxon's syntax :
>>
> 
> collection('file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs?select=*.xsl;recurse=yes')
> 
>>-Ant's syntax :
>><fileset dir="file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs"
>>includes="**/*.xsl"/>
>>-Why not using definitively the XPath syntax ?
>>
> 
> file('file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs')//*[ends-with(name(.),'xsl')])
> 
>>or
>>file('file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs')//*[@extension='xsl']
>>or whatever à la XPath ?
> 
> 
>   Saxon's syntax is an "à la XPath" syntax, isn't it?

'file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs?select=*.xsl;recurse=yes'

this part is not, comparing to what I proposed


> 
>   Regards,
> 
> --drkm
> 
-- 
Cordialement,

               ///
              (. .)
  --------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
|      Philippe Poulard       |
  -----------------------------
  http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
        Have the RefleX !

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML aggregation question?
    • From: Florent Georges

• References:
  • Re: XML aggregation question?
    • From: Florent Georges