• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Handling of PIs (was RE: Choosing a target name...)
• From: Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...>
• Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:07:04 -0700 (PDT)
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=prkuLhu3r9wGXMQ+3vBCZLh1xOeHojdcON6Xzw98sPRWfbIvQ4qG7DJly0Q+FExjJbibq1Yq7lX97d3sVVOEh10h/D84egGLqL2JthmFUdTlj/UUVULfnMFp2onex1gPPAEl2wwDnsJXP60s1d8ZDTu2I2aCzB5KsQP/4vbqzqA= ;
• In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D90849BA@U...>

--- "Bullard, Claude L (Len)"
<len.bullard@i...> wrote:

..
> As to PIs, the fact that so many XML processors
> don't handle 
> them says the XML specification designers' job was

I'm curious: are you thinking in general terms of XML
processing applications, or strictly about XML
processing tools (parsers, xslt/xquery tools)? I
thought that latter must handle PIs (whereas support
for comments was more optional), and at least
regarding parsers, they must be passed to handling
app/tool.

That obviously doesn't help with folks who re-define
what they think XML should mean (Soap, Xmpp) and omit
pieces they don't like.

-+ Tatu +-


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

• References:
  • RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: Help on Creating Default Namespace using DOM Parser
• Next by Date: [ANNOUNCE] Defining your own Functions in XQuery
• Previous by thread: RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by thread: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread