• To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>
• Subject: Re: overheads of pipelines
• From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 19:11:35 +1000
• Cc: bryan rasmussen <rasmussen.bryan@g...>, XML Dev <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <445F0530.7030901@k...>
• Organization: Zenucom Pty Ltd
• References: <3bb44c6e0605072245s57593c62le4d51ce9f5ad1801@m...> <445F0530.7030901@k...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.8-1.1.fc4 (X11/20060501)

extensibility is future proofing

come back later and share stories of when you should have furure 
proofed, but for the moment you didn't.

win today, lose tomorrow - it's a big gamble.

rick

Jirka Kosek wrote:

> bryan rasmussen wrote:
>
>> 2. should one always build the most extensible application even if the
>> current needs do not require extensibility - my personal opinion is
>> yeah
>
>
> I think that extreme programming folks would say "NO".
> I would say "It depends". ;-)
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>!DSPAM:445f04b080137354971447!
>

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@z...
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

• References:
  • overheads of pipelines
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: overheads of pipelines
    • From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@k...>

• Prev by Date: Re: overheads of pipelines
• Next by Date: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Previous by thread: Re: overheads of pipelines
• Next by thread: NEW BOOK: An Introduction to XML and Web Technologies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread