• To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: [Watchers of the Web] The evolving form of information on the Web?
• From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
• Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 19:49:40 +0200
• Cc: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L1ryeIr/FfKhgR/IumOC7rMHvyUSLMlCHF/t4aOzXR+14j4E7O9tjZCCkbb0V7wEmk4f4fRUwaKzYmMI4UJPoPLTHjUF/N4R+yRYVBsqO4pQjSEV9omxoGsx1Clf0XLYRAgJKFtQf7wL3ecoLU3b2x2WVr3tgwhr4cpvTSecevo=
• In-reply-to: <004f01c671fa$d46f6270$6401a8c0@turtle>
• References: <B8415163A689094689542C617ECA0366B1D91A@I...> <004f01c671fa$d46f6270$6401a8c0@turtle>

>
> The usual approach in these situations is to decide what conclusions you
> want to come to, and then select the measurement approach that is most
> likely to justify your conclusions.
Surely this a snarky observation on the quality of most research, and
not a recommendation for action?!?


Cheers,
Bryan Rasmussen

• References:
  • RE: [Watchers of the Web] The evolving form of information on the Web?
    • From: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@m...>
  • RE: [Watchers of the Web] The evolving form of information on the Web?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Next by Date: Re: Java NVDL implementation
• Previous by thread: RE: [Watchers of the Web] The evolving form of information on the Web?
• Next by thread: Re: [Watchers of the Web] The evolving form of informationon the Web?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread