• To: "Dan Vint" <dvint@d...>,"Rick Jelliffe" <rjelliffe@a...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 10:36:38 -0500
• Thread-index: AcZtMd6y7oXObpQQS7aKyYgQNnFVlwAAndLA
• Thread-topic: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction

Or a pretty good way to hobble SOAP in the market 
because REST keeps working anyway.

There is a line in the last Godfather movie where
one of the characters says, 'your enemies always 
exploit what you leave behind' or something like that.

As Rick said, standards are about agreement.  Where 
one disagrees, the standard becomes a meat cleaver.

len


From: Dan Vint [mailto:dvint@d...]

And hopefully they do not need to send their data via SOAP to any 
application as SOPA has overlayed restrictions on the XML they accept and 
anything with PIs is not allowed!

I guess this is one way to make another standard into what you want when 
the original working group didn't do what you want. ;-)

• Prev by Date: RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by Date: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Previous by thread: RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by thread: Help on Creating Default Namespace using DOM Parser
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread