• To: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>
• Subject: Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
• From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...>
• Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 06:16:23 +0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <3951.217.124.88.220.1148317772.squirrel@w...>
• Organization: xmlhack.ru
• References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060522112019.02ba51b0@C...><3213.217.124.88.220.1148303541.squirrel@w...><20060522180111.2bca58af.olpa@x...><3951.217.124.88.220.1148317772.squirrel@w...>

Hi!

I've got your point.

On Mon, 22 May 2006 10:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
<juanrgonzaleza@c...> wrote:

> ... My real point is if we would are providing
> something like
> 
> <apply><em/>important</apply>
> 
> rather than traditional
> 
> <em>important</em>
> 

I'm a lazy thinker and can't imagine a situation where I would need it.

Meanwhile, you have to find an interpretation for something like it:

<apply> <em><x/><y/></em> important </apply>


> 
> Juan R.
> 
> Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Oleg Parashchenko  olpa@ http://xmlhack.ru/  XML news in Russian
http://uucode.com/blog/  Generative Programming, XML, TeX, Scheme
XSieve at XTech 2006: http://xtech06.usefulinc.com/schedule/detail/44

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>

• References:
  • Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>
  • Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
    • From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <olpa@x...>
  • Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
    • From: <juanrgonzaleza@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
• Next by Date: RE: Re: [Schematron-love-in] ISO Schematron Update (RETRY)
• Previous by thread: Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
• Next by thread: Re: Theoretical ruminations on SXML and XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread