• To: Michael Good <musicxml@g...>
• Subject: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 14:19:53 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <b5ca83430605031057q2cc5ce4sde9b48e2549074bf@m...>
• References: <b5ca83430605021612o37ed13c8h3f882849bca75532@m...> <4457ECCE.3000408@m...> <b5ca83430605031057q2cc5ce4sde9b48e2549074bf@m...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308)

Michael Good wrote:

> Thanks for the explanation. I was mistaken when I said multiple XML
> parsers were reporting this as an error. I thought I saw Xerces doing
> this but I was wrong. It was only the Altova products (XMLSPY
> Professional 2004 Release 4, DiffDog Professional 2005).

I'm not surprised to hear that. XMLSpy is notoriously non-conformant. 
They need to take some of the big chunk of cash they spend on all those 
magazine ads and redirect it into QA.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• References:
  • RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
    • From: "Michael Good" <musicxml@g...>
  • Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
    • From: "Michael Good" <musicxml@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by Date: Re: Still banging on about extensibility and validation
• Previous by thread: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by thread: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread