• To: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
• Subject: Re: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL 2.0 and Schema Extensibility
• From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:50:57 +0100
• Cc: UBL-Dev <ubl-dev@l...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060523102129.03502dd0@C...> (G. Ken Holman's message of "Tue, 23 May 2006 10:24:48 +0200")
• References: <20060516065830.dc066b1d4d2e0a1a65719ae85a8071e6.0fcf613037.wbe@e...><7.0.1.0.2.20060516162109.02b94fb8@C...><7.0.1.0.2.20060516170319.02b99a00@C...><88aed1ea0605160925x3be76eafv41ec6b632f01f47f@m...><7.0.1.0.2.20060516184750.02b6d510@C...><88aed1ea0605161412n7e447227yd78f3a049e99c43@m...><7.0.1.0.2.20060516234601.02a528e8@C...><88aed1ea0605171620p7749c1f5o91b00215ad09ea52@m...><7.0.1.0.2.20060523102129.03502dd0@C...>
• User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (linux)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

G. Ken Holman writes:

> At 2006-05-18 00:20 +0100, Fraser Goffin wrote:
>>The example schema fragment that you pointed at :-
>>
>>     <xs:choice minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
>>       <xs:any namespace="##other" processContents="skip"/>
>>       <xs:any namespace="##local" processContents="skip"/>
>>     </xs:choice>
>>
>>looks OK, but XML Spy and MSXML 4 report it as non deterministic ?

I believe per the spec. the above two wildcards do _not_ overlap so
there is no basis for an error report.

ht
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i...
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEerXxkjnJixAXWBoRAlJ+AJ0V4Ft5LFt5S13J8rIQU4ccueBfvACeIeAo
GK/UMWNsTksQj17FEHA28BI=
=K0lv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • RE: [ubl-dev] Re: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL 2.0 and Schema Extensibility
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>
  • Re: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL 2.0 and Schema Extensibility
    • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@C...>

• Prev by Date: Re: UBL 2, W3C Schema extensibility, and multiple
• Next by Date: Re: hierarchical XML in a relational DB structure - moving nodes
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL 2.0 and Schema Extensibility
• Next by thread: RE: RE: [ubl-dev] Re: Re: [ubl-dev] UBL 2.0 and Schema Extensibility
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread