• To: "'Chiusano Joseph'" <chiusano_joseph@b...>,"'Nathan Young -X \(natyoung - Artizen at Cisco\)'" <natyoung@c...>,"'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <len.bullard@i...>,<andrzej@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 20:26:53 +0100
• In-reply-to: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F45F88003@M...>
• Thread-index: AcZ0cNhxQ9ga8QTkS6a7Qc1vdrXqwwAk/8YQAANi2+AAA4wNIAAClNFgAAFTS2A=

> 
> Yes, object oriented is a great example (not to denegrate the 
> others either). 

But if you apply "object oriented" at the level of IT systems in the large,
I believe that what you end up with is 100% equivalent to a service oriented
architecture. 

Or could someone correct me? If I bumped into a service-oriented IT system
in one bank on one side of the street, and an object-oriented IT system in
another bank on the other side of the street, how would I tell which was
which (other than by the choice of jargon on the Powerpoint slides)?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
    • From: Dave Scott <dms@h...>
  • Re: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
    • From: peastman@d...

• References:
  • RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Re: A new XML parser
• Next by Date: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Next by thread: RE: Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread