• Subject: Re: Improving XML desing?
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 11:49:26 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D932CD57@U...>
• References: <7411F30464DC9C479FB14CFD348D71D932CD57@U...>
• User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Macintosh/20060308)

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> I agree with Pete.  As soon as you introduce a new syntax, most of the
> reasons for ubiquitous XML adoption evaporate.   I assume you want to
> 'improve XML' and not nest another product inside it.  Attempts to do
> the latter have failed spectacularly.
> 

So have attempts to do the former. (Namespaces, XML 1.1, Schemas...) :-)

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• References:
  • RE: Improving XML desing?
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Improving XML desing?
• Next by Date: RE: Improving XML desing?
• Previous by thread: RE: Improving XML desing?
• Next by thread: RE: Improving XML desing?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread