• To: "'Peter Hunsberger'" <peter.hunsberger@g...>,"'Michael Good'" <musicxml@g...>
• Subject: RE: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 21:40:05 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <cc159a4a0604281330i565b0fd2h4a2d5460fdeabaeb@m...>
• Thread-index: AcZrAxZPt9JGCmCKQW6T3XqA5nVhIQAAMQ7A

> I'd vote no; use a generic app name and add extra PI data.  
> That way, if you come across yet another need for such a 
> thing in 3 more weeks (or whatever) you won't have to add 
> another PI...

What's the problem with adding another PI?

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
    • From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by Date: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Previous by thread: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Next by thread: Re: Choosing a target name for a processing instruction
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread