• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM's javascript roots)
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:32:21 -0400
• In-reply-to: <20060406182845.41789.qmail@w...>
• References: <20060406182845.41789.qmail@w...>

On Apr 6, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:

> What might be necessary is really to divide the scope
> in two somewhat disjoint pieces: case of having
> general API/framework for manipulating XML within
> browser platform; and the case of using DOM on other
> platforms.
>
> Since DOM came from the former, maybe it has more
> relevance within that domain.

Actually, it didn't and the bifurcation started with Core vs. HTML DOM.

• References:
  • DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM's javascript roots)
    • From: Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Inversion of control (was: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?))
• Next by Date: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Previous by thread: DOM usage within browsers. vs. 'stand-alone' DOM (was DOM's javascript roots)
• Next by thread: RE: Re: DOM's javascript roots (was Re: HaveJDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread